Hacker Dōjo Workshop:
研究种类:课题研究
资助金额:120 USDT
分享者:十四君 Web2 五年网络安全与黑灰产业研究,Github 7K Star
现 Web3 专注研究Market、DeFi、Geth ,技术向周更博主,公众号《十四君》
本项目由Hacker Dōjo资助,文章转载请联系
Telegram: @DoraDojo0
WeChat: @HackerDojo0
从公开私钥的陷阱说起
https://etherscan.io/address/0xb89d8a7c56241b550A6f8a0938BBBB2E2fe3166F
问答
-
获得私钥真能转走这30W刀吗?
不能,有USDT 黑名单
-
转走与否和我手速快慢有关系吗?
无关,以太坊出块15s,内存池是公开的
- 传统抢购,先到先得,演出票等要么是内鬼,要么是近距离服务器秒杀。
- 链上抢购,价高者得,内存池内是基本公开,矿工可以排序交易。
-
谁是最终受益者,他赚了多少?
-
拓展问题
后来资金确实被转走了,如何做到?
区块链的信息
-
从一个实时动画小游戏开始
问题:他为什么能画出来这样的动画图?
1. 如何得知交易与左侧应用的关系
2. 交易签名是没有时间的,那如何统计出下方长期panding的交易?
3. 每个车厢为什么会有出来的交易?
- 区块信息详解
问题:
1. 该笔交易失败,该笔交易涉及的数据就会全部回滚吗?
2. MethodId 是如何算出来?
标准资产协议
-
ERC20标准是什么?
-
接口概览
// SPDX-License-Identifier: UNLICENSED pragma solidity >=0.5.0; interface IERC20 { event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint value); event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint value); function name() external view returns (string memory); function symbol() external view returns (string memory); function decimals() external view returns (uint8); function totalSupply() external view returns (uint); function balanceOf(address owner) external view returns (uint); function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint); function approve(address spender, uint value) external returns (bool); function transfer(address to, uint value) external returns (bool); function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint value) external returns (bool); }
-
完整实现-OpenZeppelin
/** *Submitted for verification at testnet.bscscan.com on 2023-08-13 */ // File: @openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol // OpenZeppelin Contracts v4.4.1 (utils/Context.sol) pragma solidity ^0.8.0; /** * @dev Provides information about the current execution context, including the * sender of the transaction and its data. While these are generally available * via msg.sender and msg.data, they should not be accessed in such a direct * manner, since when dealing with meta-transactions the account sending and * paying for execution may not be the actual sender (as far as an application * is concerned). * * This contract is only required for intermediate, library-like contracts. */ abstract contract Context { function _msgSender() internal view virtual returns (address) { return msg.sender; } function _msgData() internal view virtual returns (bytes calldata) { return msg.data; } } // File: @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol // OpenZeppelin Contracts (last updated v4.9.0) (token/ERC20/IERC20.sol) pragma solidity ^0.8.0; /** * @dev Interface of the ERC20 standard as defined in the EIP. */ interface IERC20 { /** * @dev Emitted when `value` tokens are moved from one account (`from`) to * another (`to`). * * Note that `value` may be zero. */ event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value); /** * @dev Emitted when the allowance of a `spender` for an `owner` is set by * a call to {approve}. `value` is the new allowance. */ event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value); /** * @dev Returns the amount of tokens in existence. */ function totalSupply() external view returns (uint256); /** * @dev Returns the amount of tokens owned by `account`. */ function balanceOf(address account) external view returns (uint256); /** * @dev Moves `amount` tokens from the caller's account to `to`. * * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded. * * Emits a {Transfer} event. */ function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) external returns (bool); /** * @dev Returns the remaining number of tokens that `spender` will be * allowed to spend on behalf of `owner` through {transferFrom}. This is * zero by default. * * This value changes when {approve} or {transferFrom} are called. */ function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint256); /** * @dev Sets `amount` as the allowance of `spender` over the caller's tokens. * * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded. * * IMPORTANT: Beware that changing an allowance with this method brings the risk * that someone may use both the old and the new allowance by unfortunate * transaction ordering. One possible solution to mitigate this race * condition is to first reduce the spender's allowance to 0 and set the * desired value afterwards: * https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/20#issuecomment-263524729 * * Emits an {Approval} event. */ function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) external returns (bool); /** * @dev Moves `amount` tokens from `from` to `to` using the * allowance mechanism. `amount` is then deducted from the caller's * allowance. * * Returns a boolean value indicating whether the operation succeeded. * * Emits a {Transfer} event. */ function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 amount) external returns (bool); } // File: @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol // OpenZeppelin Contracts v4.4.1 (token/ERC20/extensions/IERC20Metadata.sol) pragma solidity ^0.8.0; /** * @dev Interface for the optional metadata functions from the ERC20 standard. * * _Available since v4.1._ */ interface IERC20Metadata is IERC20 { /** * @dev Returns the name of the token. */ function name() external view returns (string memory); /** * @dev Returns the symbol of the token. */ function symbol() external view returns (string memory); /** * @dev Returns the decimals places of the token. */ function decimals() external view returns (uint8); } // File: @openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol // OpenZeppelin Contracts (last updated v4.9.0) (token/ERC20/ERC20.sol) pragma solidity ^0.8.0; /** * @dev Implementation of the {IERC20} interface. * * This implementation is agnostic to the way tokens are created. This means * that a supply mechanism has to be added in a derived contract using {_mint}. * For a generic mechanism see {ERC20PresetMinterPauser}. * * TIP: For a detailed writeup see our guide * https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/how-to-implement-erc20-supply-mechanisms/226[How * to implement supply mechanisms]. * * The default value of {decimals} is 18. To change this, you should override * this function so it returns a different value. * * We have followed general OpenZeppelin Contracts guidelines: functions revert * instead returning `false` on failure. This behavior is nonetheless * conventional and does not conflict with the expectations of ERC20 * applications. * * Additionally, an {Approval} event is emitted on calls to {transferFrom}. * This allows applications to reconstruct the allowance for all accounts just * by listening to said events. Other implementations of the EIP may not emit * these events, as it isn't required by the specification. * * Finally, the non-standard {decreaseAllowance} and {increaseAllowance} * functions have been added to mitigate the well-known issues around setting * allowances. See {IERC20-approve}. */ contract ERC20 is Context, IERC20, IERC20Metadata { mapping(address => uint256) private _balances; mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) private _allowances; uint256 private _totalSupply; string private _name; string private _symbol; /** * @dev Sets the values for {name} and {symbol}. * * All two of these values are immutable: they can only be set once during * construction. */ constructor(string memory name_, string memory symbol_) { _name = name_; _symbol = symbol_; } /** * @dev Returns the name of the token. */ function name() public view virtual override returns (string memory) { return _name; } /** * @dev Returns the symbol of the token, usually a shorter version of the * name. */ function symbol() public view virtual override returns (string memory) { return _symbol; } /** * @dev Returns the number of decimals used to get its user representation. * For example, if `decimals` equals `2`, a balance of `505` tokens should * be displayed to a user as `5.05` (`505 / 10 ** 2`). * * Tokens usually opt for a value of 18, imitating the relationship between * Ether and Wei. This is the default value returned by this function, unless * it's overridden. * * NOTE: This information is only used for _display_ purposes: it in * no way affects any of the arithmetic of the contract, including * {IERC20-balanceOf} and {IERC20-transfer}. */ function decimals() public view virtual override returns (uint8) { return 18; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-totalSupply}. */ function totalSupply() public view virtual override returns (uint256) { return _totalSupply; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-balanceOf}. */ function balanceOf(address account) public view virtual override returns (uint256) { return _balances[account]; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-transfer}. * * Requirements: * * - `to` cannot be the zero address. * - the caller must have a balance of at least `amount`. */ function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) { address owner = _msgSender(); _transfer(owner, to, amount); return true; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-allowance}. */ function allowance(address owner, address spender) public view virtual override returns (uint256) { return _allowances[owner][spender]; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-approve}. * * NOTE: If `amount` is the maximum `uint256`, the allowance is not updated on * `transferFrom`. This is semantically equivalent to an infinite approval. * * Requirements: * * - `spender` cannot be the zero address. */ function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) { address owner = _msgSender(); _approve(owner, spender, amount); return true; } /** * @dev See {IERC20-transferFrom}. * * Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance. This is not * required by the EIP. See the note at the beginning of {ERC20}. * * NOTE: Does not update the allowance if the current allowance * is the maximum `uint256`. * * Requirements: * * - `from` and `to` cannot be the zero address. * - `from` must have a balance of at least `amount`. * - the caller must have allowance for ``from``'s tokens of at least * `amount`. */ function transferFrom(address from, address to, uint256 amount) public virtual override returns (bool) { address spender = _msgSender(); _spendAllowance(from, spender, amount); _transfer(from, to, amount); return true; } /** * @dev Atomically increases the allowance granted to `spender` by the caller. * * This is an alternative to {approve} that can be used as a mitigation for * problems described in {IERC20-approve}. * * Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance. * * Requirements: * * - `spender` cannot be the zero address. */ function increaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 addedValue) public virtual returns (bool) { address owner = _msgSender(); _approve(owner, spender, allowance(owner, spender) + addedValue); return true; } /** * @dev Atomically decreases the allowance granted to `spender` by the caller. * * This is an alternative to {approve} that can be used as a mitigation for * problems described in {IERC20-approve}. * * Emits an {Approval} event indicating the updated allowance. * * Requirements: * * - `spender` cannot be the zero address. * - `spender` must have allowance for the caller of at least * `subtractedValue`. */ function decreaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 subtractedValue) public virtual returns (bool) { address owner = _msgSender(); uint256 currentAllowance = allowance(owner, spender); require(currentAllowance >= subtractedValue, "ERC20: decreased allowance below zero"); unchecked { _approve(owner, spender, currentAllowance - subtractedValue); } return true; } /** * @dev Moves `amount` of tokens from `from` to `to`. * * This internal function is equivalent to {transfer}, and can be used to * e.g. implement automatic token fees, slashing mechanisms, etc. * * Emits a {Transfer} event. * * Requirements: * * - `from` cannot be the zero address. * - `to` cannot be the zero address. * - `from` must have a balance of at least `amount`. */ function _transfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual { require(from != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address"); require(to != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address"); _beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); uint256 fromBalance = _balances[from]; require(fromBalance >= amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds balance"); unchecked { _balances[from] = fromBalance - amount; // Overflow not possible: the sum of all balances is capped by totalSupply, and the sum is preserved by // decrementing then incrementing. _balances[to] += amount; } emit Transfer(from, to, amount); _afterTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); } /** @dev Creates `amount` tokens and assigns them to `account`, increasing * the total supply. * * Emits a {Transfer} event with `from` set to the zero address. * * Requirements: * * - `account` cannot be the zero address. */ function _mint(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual { require(account != address(0), "ERC20: mint to the zero address"); _beforeTokenTransfer(address(0), account, amount); _totalSupply += amount; unchecked { // Overflow not possible: balance + amount is at most totalSupply + amount, which is checked above. _balances[account] += amount; } emit Transfer(address(0), account, amount); _afterTokenTransfer(address(0), account, amount); } /** * @dev Destroys `amount` tokens from `account`, reducing the * total supply. * * Emits a {Transfer} event with `to` set to the zero address. * * Requirements: * * - `account` cannot be the zero address. * - `account` must have at least `amount` tokens. */ function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal virtual { require(account != address(0), "ERC20: burn from the zero address"); _beforeTokenTransfer(account, address(0), amount); uint256 accountBalance = _balances[account]; require(accountBalance >= amount, "ERC20: burn amount exceeds balance"); unchecked { _balances[account] = accountBalance - amount; // Overflow not possible: amount <= accountBalance <= totalSupply. _totalSupply -= amount; } emit Transfer(account, address(0), amount); _afterTokenTransfer(account, address(0), amount); } /** * @dev Sets `amount` as the allowance of `spender` over the `owner` s tokens. * * This internal function is equivalent to `approve`, and can be used to * e.g. set automatic allowances for certain subsystems, etc. * * Emits an {Approval} event. * * Requirements: * * - `owner` cannot be the zero address. * - `spender` cannot be the zero address. */ function _approve(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) internal virtual { require(owner != address(0), "ERC20: approve from the zero address"); require(spender != address(0), "ERC20: approve to the zero address"); _allowances[owner][spender] = amount; emit Approval(owner, spender, amount); } /** * @dev Updates `owner` s allowance for `spender` based on spent `amount`. * * Does not update the allowance amount in case of infinite allowance. * Revert if not enough allowance is available. * * Might emit an {Approval} event. */ function _spendAllowance(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) internal virtual { uint256 currentAllowance = allowance(owner, spender); if (currentAllowance != type(uint256).max) { require(currentAllowance >= amount, "ERC20: insufficient allowance"); unchecked { _approve(owner, spender, currentAllowance - amount); } } } /** * @dev Hook that is called before any transfer of tokens. This includes * minting and burning. * * Calling conditions: * * - when `from` and `to` are both non-zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens * will be transferred to `to`. * - when `from` is zero, `amount` tokens will be minted for `to`. * - when `to` is zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens will be burned. * - `from` and `to` are never both zero. * * To learn more about hooks, head to xref:ROOT:extending-contracts.adoc#using-hooks[Using Hooks]. */ function _beforeTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual {} /** * @dev Hook that is called after any transfer of tokens. This includes * minting and burning. * * Calling conditions: * * - when `from` and `to` are both non-zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens * has been transferred to `to`. * - when `from` is zero, `amount` tokens have been minted for `to`. * - when `to` is zero, `amount` of ``from``'s tokens have been burned. * - `from` and `to` are never both zero. * * To learn more about hooks, head to xref:ROOT:extending-contracts.adoc#using-hooks[Using Hooks]. */ function _afterTokenTransfer(address from, address to, uint256 amount) internal virtual {} } // File: contracts/erc20PublicMint.sol pragma solidity ^0.8.0; contract MyToken is ERC20 { constructor() ERC20("xkh666", "xkh") { } function mint(address to,uint256 num) public { _mint(to, num); } }
-
本地体验
pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol"; contract MyToken is ERC20 { constructor() ERC20("xkh666", "xkh") { } function mint(address to,uint256 num) public { _mint(to, num); } }
-
上链体验
-
bsc测试网与水龙头领取
chrome-extension://nkbihfbeogaeaoehlefnkodbefgpgknn/home.html#settings/networks
领取方式即加入服务器后在testnet-faucet频道,发送
!faucet 你的地址
Discord -
小狐狸添加bsc测试网
-
已部署的erc20
https://testnet.bscscan.com/address/0x8a1786a2b8101b1fb334d49e4ace69ad24ca63d4#code
-
-
问题
- Gas消耗:Mint 99999 和 Mint 1e18 哪个消耗Gas多?为什么?
- 我可以转入到任意地址吗?会有什么风险?
- Mint不是一个标准的要求,那如何发现Mint的交易
协议应用层拓展
-
erc721代码
pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721URIStorage.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract MyNFT is ERC721URIStorage { constructor(string memory _tokenName, string memory _tokenSymbol) public ERC721(_tokenName, _tokenSymbol) { } //https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/13358272?v=4 //https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafybeieldy3ybghe5aqtby6y62jahtetizhaagycem4dzgwofmphlkzsde/1375.json function mint(address to, uint256 tokenId,string memory uri) public { _safeMint(to, tokenId); _setTokenURI(tokenId,uri); } }
-
为什么有租赁的需要?
- 原生协议的局限:只能证明所有权,代扣与所有权趋同
- 市场应用的需求:分离NFT的资产价值和使用价值,释放出NFT的市场流动性
- 链上安全的威胁:盗签致使资产流失
-
租赁的技术挑战
- 链上是无法信任的
- 租赁双方如何撮合?
- 信任依据为何?
- 历史协议的兼容性
- 世面应用的兼容性
-
ERC4907-无强制性的租赁声明
-
如何设置
function setUser(uint256 tokenId, address user, uint64 expires) public virtual{ require(_isApprovedOrOwner(msg.sender, tokenId),"ERC721: transfer caller is not owner nor approved"); UserInfo storage info = _users[tokenId];//新增存储登记信息 info.user = user; info.expires = expires; emit UpdateUser(tokenId,user,expires); //发出事件通知链下应用 }
-
如何查询
function userOf(uint256 tokenId)public view virtual returns(address){ if( uint256(_users[tokenId].expires) >= block.timestamp){ return _users[tokenId].user; };//执行此函数,在未到期的情况下,返回此ID的当前用户地址 else{return address(0); }//到期情况下,则返回0地址,意未占用 }
-
如何评价
- 无法向前兼容
- 原所有者权限极高,租赁者的维权能力薄弱(哪怕租赁期无法售卖和重置也好)
- Dapp应用层的兼容需增加识别方法
-
-
ERC5058-强制性的租赁声明
请注意
只有对NFT有持有权的地址,才可以给与别人锁定权。
只有对NFT有锁定权的地址,才有权解锁该 NFT(或通过到期解锁)。
锁定期可以产生(未实现)Bound NFT,来代表约束权
-
给与锁定权
function _lockApprove(address owner,address to,uint256 tokenId ) internal virtual { _lockApprovals[tokenId] = to; emit LockApproval(owner, to, tokenId); }
-
执行锁定
function _lock( address operator, uint256 tokenId, uint256 expired ) internal virtual { address owner = ERC721.ownerOf(tokenId); _beforeTokenLock(operator, owner, tokenId, expired); lockedTokens[tokenId] = expired; _lockApprovals[tokenId] = operator; emit Locked(operator, owner, tokenId, expired); _afterTokenLock(operator, owner, tokenId, expired); }
-
如何评价
总之:用户一部分权利给与一定信任,dapp也让渡一部分权益给与一定的服务。
- 锁定权难以定价,难以转化成应用场景。
- 流动性反而降低,Bound NFT本身无实物的交割权。
什么是更合适的拓展?
质(可取回,偏保管性质)、押(可变现,高利贷性质)。
典(属官营,偏不动产)、当(属民营,偏可动产)。
以上都是在期限内交换所有权、使用权,如果可以过期即具备强制转移,类似当铺思路则可以具有一定社会契约层牟利的动机。
-
-
ERC6147-半强制性的租赁声明
- 如何评价
改进点:
1. 减低4907的应用层兼容性要求,租赁给你,实际上是直接转给你,但自己还是守卫者(可以取回),但由于dapp更多使用owner,而不是userof,所以兼容性更好。
2. 降低应用耦合难度的同时,更偏用户的管理权。
局限性
1. 时间点非强制性,致使售卖定价缺乏信任。如按挂牌价租1个月,但我可以反悔。
2. 能清除授权的转移是非标准方法,为transferRemove,则opensea等无法兼容。
-
综合点评
挑战 4907 5058 6147 概述 定义租赁角色,由所有者任意控制,到期自动解除关系 强制链上锁定,出卖转移权,仅可提前解除,用作质押类Defi场景。 定义守卫角色,所有者转为守卫,租赁方获得所有权,守卫可随时解除关系 链上信任 非强制 强制 半强制 定价撮合 无(需自研平台) 无(需自研平台) 中(借助os) 信任依据 双方自觉 强行锁定 用户自觉 往前兼容 差 差 差 应用兼容 差(要识别租赁角色) 差(要识别锁定状态) 中(复用所有权) 6551才是往前兼容好的典范:拓展阅读https://km.woa.com/articles/show/583323